Intel
Sapphire Rapids Xeon-w9 3495X (launched Q1 2023) scales better with cores and threads in High Performance Linpack (HPL) than the highest-end AMD Zen 4 Threadripper Pro CPU, but very slightly worse than the 64C/128T TR 7985WX. Looks like Amdahl's Law doesn't work the same way for CPUs from different companies and foundries and even for particular CPUs!
link to Puget Systems source article
In HPCG benchmark, the 56-core Xeon matches the 96-core and the 64-core Threadripper Pro (the non-Pro is slower).
In HPL-MxP(AI) benchmark, Xeon is 124% faster than the 96-core Threadripper Pro. Not a small difference. 38.4 TFlops according to the chart.
However, in
OpenFOAM, TR 7995WX is as much as 2.65x faster than w9 3495X, which is a very significant advantage.
Intel Sapphire Rapids server and workstation CPUs are
decent for some particular workloads which suit them well. Sometimes faster than Zen 4. Or Granite Rapids faster than Zen 5. Threadripper Pro CPUs tend to be better than the cheaper non-Pro versions, especially for AI.