Social Media & Big Tech news and discussions

User avatar
caltrek
Posts: 9280
Joined: Mon May 17, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: Social Media & Big Tech news and discussions

Post by caltrek »

Boston University Study Finds Plus Size Models Rising Presence on Social Media
July 14, 2022

Introduction:
(EurekAlert) (Boston)—With the changing societal body image in America, plus size models have gained in popularity and positively impacted a body inclusive model of beauty. As such, plastic surgeons will likely see an increased demand for procedures that enhance the plus size body type according to researchers from Boston University School of Medicine (BUSM).

“While the American standard of beauty appears to idolize extreme thinness as seen in Victoria Secret models and their diminishing body sizes, we sought to explore the impact of plus size models by reviewing their body size metrics and social media presence to better understand their emerging role in the current standards of beauty,” explained corresponding author Neelam Vashi, MD, associate professor of dermatology at BUSM and director of the Boston University Cosmetic and Laser Center at Boston Medical Center.

A total of 169 models were included in this study (159 plus sized models and 10 mainstream models). Plus sized model metrics averaged: height 69 inches (in.), bust 40 in., waist 43 in., hips 46 in and dress size 14. The waist-to-hip ratio remained low amongst mainstream models (0.69) and plus size models (0.74), illustrating that this remains a constant and objective standard of beauty across all body types. Using the Fashion Model Directory and various modeling agency websites, the researchers obtained data for: eye color, hair color, height, bust measurement, waist measurement, dress and shoe size. Data pertaining to social media presence was collected for each model using Social Blade (http://socialblade.com). For comparison, the top 10 highest paid mainstream models were determined using Forbes.

Collectively, 144 plus-sized models had 51 million followers and 190,000 total posts. While the top 10 highest paid mainstream models averaged 38 million followers compared to the top 10 plus sized models with an average of approximately 3.8 million followers, there was no significant difference between the average likes per post, comments per post and total posts between the top mainstream models and top plus-sized models.
According to the researchers, the fashion industry has also acknowledged the increasing popularity of plus size models by representing curvaceous figures within their marketing campaigns and even altering models figures with padding.
Read more here: https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/958813
Don't mourn, organize.

-Joe Hill
User avatar
caltrek
Posts: 9280
Joined: Mon May 17, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: Social Media & Big Tech news and discussions

Post by caltrek »

Elon Musk Wants Twitter Trial to Wait Until February 2023
by Jay Peters
July 15, 2022

Introduction:
(The Verge) Elon Musk’s legal team has responded to Twitter’s lawsuit against him, saying that the company is demanding an unreasonably fast trial. In response, Musk’s team asks that the case not be heard until next year, as reported earlier by Bloomberg.

Twitter has pushed for the trial to take place in mid-September, justifying the request to expedite things given that Musk and Twitter’s merger agreement has an October 24th “presumptive drop-dead date.” However, Musk’s team is asking that the trial not be held until February 13th, 2023 trial at the earliest, the filing notes.

Twitter declined to comment on the matter, and pointed to its initial complaint filed Tuesday.

Twitter sued Musk earlier this week after he officially tried to bail on his $44 billion agreement to buy the company. Nearly immediately after he said he intended to pull the plug, Twitter board chairman Bret Taylor said the company would be taking Musk to court, and the company filed its lawsuit on Tuesday. Musk hadn’t responded via the court until Friday, though on Tuesday, he did tweet.

Musk’s primary assertion for wanting to terminate the merger is that Twitter has not given him the data to “‘make an independent assessment of the prevalence of fake or spam accounts on Twitter’s platform,” his legal team wrote last week. His team again invoked the bots issue in Friday’s filing, noting “the core dispute over false and spam accounts is fundamental to Twitter’s value. It is also extremely fact and expert intensive, requiring substantial time for discovery.”
Read more here: https://www.theverge.com/2022/7/15/232 ... lawsuit
Don't mourn, organize.

-Joe Hill
weatheriscool
Posts: 24488
Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 6:16 pm
Contact:

Re: Social Media & Big Tech news and discussions

Post by weatheriscool »

Russia fines Google $370 million for repeated content violations, regulator says
Source: Reuters
Alphabet's (GOOGL.O) Google was fined 21.1 billion roubles ($373 million) on Monday by a Moscow court for a repeated failure to remove content Russia deems illegal, such as "fake news" about the conflict in Ukraine, Russia's communications regulator said.

Moscow has long objected to foreign tech platforms' distribution of content that falls foul of its restrictions. But the simmering dispute has erupted into a full-on battle since Moscow assembled its armed forces before sending them into Ukraine in February.

Alphabet's YouTube has been a particular target of the state's ire but, unlike Twitter (TWTR.N) and Meta Platforms' (META.O) Facebook and Instagram, it has not been blocked.

The regulator, Roskomnadzor, said the Tagansky District Court had fined Google 21.1 billion roubles for repeatedly failing to restrict access promptly to banned materials, and singled out YouTube for particular criticism.
Read more: https://www.reuters.com/technology/goog ... 022-07-18/
User avatar
caltrek
Posts: 9280
Joined: Mon May 17, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: Social Media & Big Tech news and discussions

Post by caltrek »

Twitter Says Elon Musk's Argument to Delay Trial "Fails at Every Level"
by Sara Fischer
July 18, 2022

Introduction:
(Axios) Twitter on Monday filed a reply to Elon Musk's Friday response to the company's lawsuit against the billionaire, saying Musk's request to delay a trial "fails at every level."

Why it matters: A Tuesday hearing at a Delaware Chancery Court will determine whether the trial moves forward in September.

• Twitter requested an expedited trial in a lawsuit filed against Musk last Tuesday.
Details: In the filing Monday, Twitter argued that Musk's response doesn't dispute that Twitter’s lawsuit meets the standards for expedition.

• Citing historical legal precedents, Twitter argues that cases like the one pertaining to its lawsuit “are routinely expedited” because they “readily fit within the standards for expedition.”
Read more here: https://www.axios.com/2022/07/18/twit ... al-delay
Don't mourn, organize.

-Joe Hill
User avatar
caltrek
Posts: 9280
Joined: Mon May 17, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: Social Media & Big Tech news and discussions

Post by caltrek »

Twitter Posts Quarterly Sales Drop and Says It Spent $33 Million on Pending Musk Acquisition
by Paul Sawers
July 22, 2022

Extract:
(TechCrunch) Twitter has published its Q2 2022 results, with the social networking giant’s numbers falling short of analysts’ estimates across user growth and revenues.

Perhaps more interestingly, however, Twitter also revealed that it spent $33 million in Q2 on Elon Musk’s pending acquisition.

Today’s results represent Twitter’s second earnings since accepting Elon Musk’s $44 billion acquisition bid back in April, but a lot has happened in those intervening months. To cut a long story short, Musk decided he didn’t want to buy Twitter any more, but Twitter is trying to force the deal through, and a judge ruled last week that the company could expedite legal proceedings against the billionaire.

Twitter announced that its Q2 revenue amounted to $1.18 billion, down around 5% on the previous quarter and 1% on the corresponding period last year — analysts had estimated its Q2 revenues at around $1.32 billion. This, according to Twitter, reflects “headwinds’ in the advertising industry related to the current economic environment, while it also pointed to “uncertainty” caused by Musk’s attempts to pull out from the deal.

But arguably the most interesting nugget was its year-on-year increase in costs and expenses, which grew 31% to $1.52 billion.
Read more here: https://techcrunch.com/2022/07/22/twi ... isition/
Don't mourn, organize.

-Joe Hill
User avatar
caltrek
Posts: 9280
Joined: Mon May 17, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: Social Media & Big Tech news and discussions

Post by caltrek »

Social Media Helps Scientists Monitor Rarely Sighted Whales
August 11, 2022

Introduction:
(EurekAlert) Photographs shared by members of the public, via Facebook and nature-watching network iNaturalist, helped scientists assess how the species is faring around the Aotearoa New Zealand mainland.

Carried out in cooperation with the Department of Conservation and published in the journal Ocean & Coastal Management, the study* reveals that southern right whales are slower than expected at re-establishing a habitat in mainland waters.

The research was led by Annabelle Cranswick, a masters student in the Faculty of Science at Waipapa Taumata Rau, University of Auckland. Sightings of the whale rose between 2003 and 2010, but the increase wasn’t sustained over the past decade, Cranswick found. That’s despite some high-profile incidents such as the appearance of Matariki, the southern right whale which captured the nation’s heart while lingering in Wellington Harbour in 2018.

One possibility is that the species’ knowledge of mainland wintering grounds was lost when numbers crashed because of whaling.

“Photos supplied on social media and by citizen scientists are proving so important for us to monitor populations of these recovering whales,” says Cranswick. “We can assess that yes, this is a southern right whale, and discover how long a whale stayed in a particular area.
Read more here: https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/961660 and here:* https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ ... d=coauthor
Don't mourn, organize.

-Joe Hill
User avatar
caltrek
Posts: 9280
Joined: Mon May 17, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: Social Media & Big Tech news and discussions

Post by caltrek »

The SEC Asked Twitter to Explain Its User Metrics After Elon Musk Complained
by Russell Brandom
August 24, 2022

Introduction:
(The Verge) This summer, the SEC conducted an active review of Twitter’s user numbers in response to concerns of bot activity, as revealed in new filings made public on Wednesday. The review came in the weeks after Elon Musk raised concerns over the same user figures and suggests federal regulators took Musk’s allegations seriously.

Notably, the review began more than a week before the full whistleblower report by Peiter “Mudge” Zatko, although it deals with many of the same concerns he reported to the SEC.

“We note your estimate that the average number of false or spam accounts during fiscal 2021 continues to represent fewer than 5% of mDAU,” the commission wrote to Twitter in a letter dated June 15th. “To the extent material, please disclose the methodology used in calculating these figures and the underlying judgements and assumptions used by management.”

Seven days later, Twitter responded with a description of the methodology that is broadly consistent with the company’s public statements. As described in the statement, Twitter conducts a human review of thousands of randomly chosen accounts out of the mDAU sample every quarter and flags for spam and platform manipulation where appropriate.

It’s not clear whether this explanation was good enough for the SEC.
Read more here: https://www.theverge.com/2022/8/24/233 ... wer-mudge
Don't mourn, organize.

-Joe Hill
User avatar
caltrek
Posts: 9280
Joined: Mon May 17, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: Social Media & Big Tech news and discussions

Post by caltrek »

What Makes Us Share Posts on Social Media?
August 25, 2022

Introduction:
(EurekAlert) The average internet user spends nearly three hours a day using social media. It’s clear that social media is becoming increasingly crucial to sharing important information with the public—like how to stay safe from COVID-19, for example—and researchers want to know what makes a piece of media compelling enough for people to share it online.

A new study published in the Journal of Experimental Psychology: General led by University of Pennsylvania researchers Danielle Cosme and Emily Falk analyzed the behavior of more than 3,000 individuals to explore the psychology behind sharing information online. It turns out that the answer is quite straightforward: People share information that they feel is meaningful to themselves or to the people they know. Cosme and her team test what contributes to “value-based virality”—essentially that information on the internet can go viral because people find it inherently valuable, either to themselves or to society.

This finding is key to crafting effective messaging for social causes, says Cosme, a research director at the Annenberg School for Communication’s Communication Neuroscience Lab. Knowing the psychological ingredients that make a person share a post on social media can help scientists share facts about climate change or public health officials dispel myths about vaccines.

Cosme’s research shows that people pay more attention to information they perceive to be related to themselves.

Similarly, humans are social beings and love to connect with each other. Sharing information activates reward centers in our brain. And when we communicate with others, we consider what the other person is thinking or wants to hear—a quality known as social relevance.
Read more here: https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/962918
Don't mourn, organize.

-Joe Hill
weatheriscool
Posts: 24488
Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 6:16 pm
Contact:

Re: Social Media & Big Tech news and discussions

Post by weatheriscool »

Fox Reports Trump's TRUTH Social Faces 'Big Money Woes,' Owes Web Host $1.6 Million in Outstanding P
Source: mediaite
At least he’s consistent. The ex-president with a decades-long history of screwing over his vendors is once again the face of a company with major financial troubles and unhappy unpaid vendors.

TRUTH Social, the social media platform launched by former President Donald Trump to post his various complaints and musings after getting permabanned from Twitter, is reportedly having major financial problems, including owing its web hosting company $1.6 million.

The scoop was tweeted Thursday afternoon by Fox Business senior correspondent Charlie Gasparino, who wrote there were “big money woes” at TRUTH Social, specifically describing how one of its “biggest vendors,” web-hosting service provider RightForge, was owed $1.6 million after the company had fallen months behind in its payments.

Read more: https://www.mediaite.com/trump/fox-repo ... -payments/
weatheriscool
Posts: 24488
Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 6:16 pm
Contact:

Re: Social Media & Big Tech news and discussions

Post by weatheriscool »

Meta's Facebook agrees to settle Cambridge Analytica data privacy suit
Source: Politico

BY CAMILLE GIJS

Meta's Facebook settled a long-running lawsuit in a U.S. court seeking damages for letting third parties, including Cambridge Analytica, access the private data of users.

The preliminary settlement was disclosed in a court filing late Friday. The terms were not disclosed.

Lawyers for the plaintiffs and Facebook asked the judge to put the lawsuit on hold for 60 days to allow the parties to “finalize a written settlement agreement” and present it for preliminary approval by the court.

Facebook users sued the company in 2018 after it was revealed that it had violated consumer privacy regulations by sharing personal data of users with third parties, including Cambridge Analytica, a firm connected with Donald Trump’s presidential campaign. The scandal saw the data of 87 million users scraped and shared without their consent.
Read more: https://www.politico.eu/article/metas-f ... vacy-suit/
weatheriscool
Posts: 24488
Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 6:16 pm
Contact:

Re: Social Media & Big Tech news and discussions

Post by weatheriscool »

Musk sends fresh letter to scrap Twitter deal after whistleblower claims
Source: Reuters


Elon Musk has sent an additional letter of deal termination to Twitter Inc (TWTR.N) to include a recent whistleblower complaint from former security head of the social media firm as another reason to scrap the $44 billion deal.

Last week, Peiter Zatko, a famed hacker known as "Mudge", said in his complaint that Twitter prioritized user growth over reducing spam and falsely claimed it had a solid security plan. read more

If the allegation are true, then Twitter has breached some of the provisions of the merger agreement, Musk and his legal team said in a letter dated Aug. 29.

Twitter, however, said in its regulatory filing the fresh termination notice was invalid and wrongful under the deal terms.
Read more: https://www.reuters.com/technology/musk ... 022-08-30/
User avatar
caltrek
Posts: 9280
Joined: Mon May 17, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: Social Media & Big Tech news and discussions

Post by caltrek »

'January 6th All Over Again': Facebook Accused of Fueling Bolsonaro's Coup-Mongering
by Jake Johnson
September 6, 2022

Introduction:
(Common Dreams) Trailing badly in the polls with the presidential election less than a month away, far-right Brazilian leader Jair Bolsonaro is attempting to galvanize his supporters with incendiary rhetoric and lies about the integrity of the vote—and Facebook is supplying him with a megaphone to do so.

That's according to a new report released Monday by SumOfUs, a global group that's been tracking Facebook's failure to combat blatant disinformation on its platform ahead of Brazil's closely watched October 2 presidential election.

The report finds that Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp—each owned by Meta—"are being used by Bolsonaro and his allies to push election lies and grow Brazil's own 'Stop the Steal' movement," a reference to former U.S. President Donald Trump's effort to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential contest.

That campaign culminated in the January 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol, and observers fear that similar or far worse violence could occur in Brazil, where Bolsonaro has indicated he may not concede defeat and hinted at a coup attempt if his leftist opponent, former president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, prevails.

"This is January 6th all over again—Meta is actively helping mobilize an online army in Brazil that's peddling conspiracy theories about the integrity of the election and threatening a violent coup," said Flora Rebello Arduini, campaign director for SumOfUs. "Regulators the world over need to take urgent action, or we'll only see these kinds of attacks on democracy intensify."
Read more here: https://www.commondreams.org/news/2022 ... mongering
Don't mourn, organize.

-Joe Hill
User avatar
caltrek
Posts: 9280
Joined: Mon May 17, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: Social Media & Big Tech news and discussions

Post by caltrek »

We Now Interrupt Nothing to Bring You News of the Queen’s Death
by Jacob Rosenberg
September 9, 2022

Introduction:
(Mother Jones) The news of Queen Elizabeth’s death sent off a wave of tributes, shitposts, and denunciations for the departed monarch from people around the world. We all waved goodbye; Ireland even did it with just its middle finger.

As I watched the outpouring of grief and antipathy, one thing was notable: our inability to shut up.

Historically, when major news happens, the broadcast is stopped for a special announcement. A reverent halt begins. Now, the opposite appears to have swallowed that tradition. Major news sparks a worldwide bang in the content machine. The queen’s death did not stop us. It got us started—and now we’re in frenetic overdrive.
Read more here: https://www.motherjones.com/mojo-wire/ ... a-deluge/
Don't mourn, organize.

-Joe Hill
User avatar
Time_Traveller
Posts: 3025
Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 4:49 pm
Location: New York City, USA, November 5th 2032 C.E.

Re: Social Media & Big Tech news and discussions

Post by Time_Traveller »

Twitter shareholders approve Musk’s $44bn buyout as trial looms
14 Sep 2022 06:40

Twitter shareholders approved billionaire Elon Musk’s proposed $44 billion buyout, paving the way for a trial next month to determine the deal’s fate.

A majority of Twitter shareholders voted in favour of accepting Musk’s $54.20-a-share offer to acquire the social-networking company, according to a preliminary vote count read on Tuesday. Musk made the bid in April and has since sought to rescind it. Twitter’s board — along with two prominent advisory firms — had encouraged investors to ratify the deal. The company’s shares were little changed after the vote and closed at $41.74, well below Musk’s proposed price.

The special shareholder meeting convened for the tally lasted 7 minutes, with polls open for about 3 minutes. Investors could also submit votes for several weeks ahead of the meeting, and Twitter sent numerous messages encouraging them to vote ahead of time.

While investor approval was required to finalise the deal, its consummation is far from a sure thing. Musk in July said he was canceling the agreement, claiming that Twitter misled him about the size of the company’s user base and the number of bots and spam accounts. Twitter denies those accusations, and sued Musk in a Delaware court to force him to complete the acquisition. Musk then counter-sued the company.

The company said 98.6% of the votes cast were in favour of the deal. Musk, Twitter’s largest shareholder, didn’t vote at all, according to two people familiar with his decision. Musk owned nearly 10% of Twitter — more than 73 million shares — when he agreed to acquire the company.
https://www.moneyweb.co.za/news/tech/tw ... ial-looms/

Unfortunately, this is another step of me officially leaving Twitter. Some people have already left for alternate Twitter social media platforms.
“In the quantum multiverse, every choice, every decision you've ever and never made exists in an unimaginably vast ensemble of parallel universes.”
User avatar
wjfox
Site Admin
Posts: 13586
Joined: Sat May 15, 2021 6:09 pm
Location: Essex, UK
Contact:

Re: Social Media & Big Tech news and discussions

Post by wjfox »

This SUCKS.

And it will encourage more people to use adblockers, which has a knock-on effect to content creators like me (who use minimal advertising).

-----

YouTube Free is Silently Testing 5 Ads, instead of 2, Before Your Video Starts

Sep 13, 2022

YouTube, the video-sharing social media platform wholly owned by Google, has recently silently implemented a new ad format starting this September 2022. YouTube users who are not subscribed to YouTube Premium, will now receive up to 5 advertisements to be watched, before your video starts.

The news broke out when several YouTube Free users started complaining on Twitter and Reddit that they have been receiving 5 ads instead of 2, before they could watch their YouTube video.

For several YouTube Free users, they reported that they have received 5 unskippable advertisements as opposed to skippable advertisements before a video-watching session, and this caused dissent and upset among the users.

https://www.gizmochina.com/2022/09/13/y ... eo-starts/


Image
User avatar
Time_Traveller
Posts: 3025
Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 4:49 pm
Location: New York City, USA, November 5th 2032 C.E.

Re: Social Media & Big Tech news and discussions

Post by Time_Traveller »

wjfox wrote: Thu Sep 15, 2022 11:55 am This SUCKS.

And it will encourage more people to use adblockers, which has a knock-on effect to content creators like me (who use minimal advertising).

-----

YouTube Free is Silently Testing 5 Ads, instead of 2, Before Your Video Starts

Sep 13, 2022

YouTube, the video-sharing social media platform wholly owned by Google, has recently silently implemented a new ad format starting this September 2022. YouTube users who are not subscribed to YouTube Premium, will now receive up to 5 advertisements to be watched, before your video starts.

The news broke out when several YouTube Free users started complaining on Twitter and Reddit that they have been receiving 5 ads instead of 2, before they could watch their YouTube video.

For several YouTube Free users, they reported that they have received 5 unskippable advertisements as opposed to skippable advertisements before a video-watching session, and this caused dissent and upset among the users.

https://www.gizmochina.com/2022/09/13/y ... eo-starts/


Image
Or like me walk away from your PC/Laptop until it's gone.
“In the quantum multiverse, every choice, every decision you've ever and never made exists in an unimaginably vast ensemble of parallel universes.”
User avatar
caltrek
Posts: 9280
Joined: Mon May 17, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: Social Media & Big Tech news and discussions

Post by caltrek »

Zoom Down In Major Outage
by Amanda Silberling
September 15, 2022

Introduction:
(TechCrunch) If you had a meeting you really didn’t want to attend this morning, it’s your lucky day. Zoom’s status website shows there is a major outage, affecting users’ ability to join meetings. According to the crowd-sourced DownDetector, tens of thousands of Zoom users are reporting outages this morning, beginning around 10:30 AM ET.

“We are aware of issues currently impacting Zoom. Our engineering team is investigating this matter,” a Zoom spokesperson told TechCrunch. Users eager to hop back on their meetings can keep track of the latest updates at status.zoom.com.

On DownDetector, most reports show trouble joining a conference. Geographically, outage reports are streaming in from across the U.S. and Europe, though they may extend to other regions as well.
Read more here: https://techcrunch.com/2022/09/15/zoom ... r-outage/
Don't mourn, organize.

-Joe Hill
User avatar
caltrek
Posts: 9280
Joined: Mon May 17, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: Social Media & Big Tech news and discussions

Post by caltrek »

Federal Appeals Court Upholds Controversial Texas Social Media Law Restricting Content Moderation
by Brian Fung
September 16, 2022

Introduction:
(CNN Business) — A federal appeals court on Friday upheld a controversial Texas law that restricts the ability of Facebook, Twitter and YouTube to moderate content on their platforms, setting up a potential Supreme Court showdown while also renewing uncertainties about how tech platforms may operate in the state in the future.

The Texas law, known as HB 20, does not violate the First Amendment rights of tech platforms by requiring them to host speech they find objectionable, according to the decision by a three-judge panel at the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.

“Today we reject the idea that corporations have a freewheeling First Amendment right to censor what people say,” the judges wrote.
The decision is a defeat for the tech industry, which had sued to block the law, alleging it was unconstitutional. Earlier this year, another appellate court blocked a similar law in Florida from going into effect, citing the same arguments.

Texas officials passed HB 20 last year amid allegations that tech platforms unfairly censor conservative speech. Social media companies have widely denied the claims, but the Texas law imposes sweeping obligations on platforms, prohibiting them from moving to “block, ban, remove, deplatform, demonetize, de-boost, restrict, deny equal access or visibility to, or otherwise discriminate against expression.”
Read more here: https://www.cnn.com/2022/09/16/tech/te ... dex.html

Extract:
(Tech Dirt) (Federal Appeals Court) Judge Oldham insists that concerns about forcing websites to post speech from Nazis, terrorist propaganda, and Holocaust denial are purely hypothetical. Really.

The Platforms do not directly engage with any of these concerns. Instead, their primary contention—beginning on page 1 of their brief and repeated throughout and at oral argument—is that we should declare HB 20 facially invalid because it prohibits the Platforms from censoring “pro-Nazi speech, terrorist propaganda, [and] Holocaust denial[s].” Red Br. at 1.

Far from justifying pre-enforcement facial invalidation, the Platforms’ obsession with terrorists and Nazis proves the opposite. The Supreme Court has instructed that “(i)n determining whether a law is facially invalid,” we should avoid “speculat[ing] about ‘hypothetical’ or ‘imaginary’ cases.” Wash. State Grange, 552 U.S. at 449–50. Overbreadth doctrine has a “tendency . . . to summon forth an endless stream of fanciful hypotheticals,” and this case is no exception. United States v. Williams, 553 U.S. 285, 301 (2008). But it’s improper to exercise the Article III judicial power based on “hypothetical cases thus imagined.” Raines, 362 U.S. at 22; cf. SinenengSmith, 140 S. Ct. at 1585–86 (Thomas, J., concurring) (explaining the tension between overbreadth adjudication and the constitutional limits on judicial power).
[/i]

These are not hypotheticals. This is literally what these websites have to deal with on a daily basis. And which, under Texas’ law, they no longer could do.

Oldham continually focuses (incorrectly and incoherently) on the idea that editorial discretion is censorship. There’s a reason that we’ve spent the last few years explaining how the two are wholly different — and part of it was to avoid people like Oldham getting confused. Apparently it didn’t work.
For the lengthy and technical article in TechDirt discussing this decision: https://www.techdirt.com/2022/09/16/5t ... moderate/
Don't mourn, organize.

-Joe Hill
User avatar
caltrek
Posts: 9280
Joined: Mon May 17, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: Social Media & Big Tech news and discussions

Post by caltrek »

Florida Asks Supreme Court to Review Social Media Censorship Law
by Kelsey Reichmann
September 21, 2022

Introduction:
WASHINGTON (Courthouse News) — Florida’s attorney general on Wednesday asked the Supreme Court to settle a controversial legal battle playing out across the country as states attempt to regulate how social media companies moderate content on their sites.

The petition challenges a ruling on a Florida law aimed at punishing social media platforms for removing “conservative ideas” from their sites. According to Florida, social media companies have developed a “censorial streak” that allows them to manipulate “a critical forum in our marketplace of ideas.”

“In S.B. 7072, Florida took point in preventing social-media platforms from abusing their power over the public square,” Florida Solicitor General Henry Whitaker wrote in the state’s petition. “The Act, as relevant here, requires disclosure about how and when the platforms censor speech and requires the platforms to host some speech that they would otherwise prefer not to host.”

Florida’s law — known as SB 7072 — requires social media companies to disclose how and when the platforms censors speech, and to host speech they disagree with. It allows the state to fine large companies $250,000 a day if they remove an account of a statewide political candidate, and $25,000 a day if they remove an account of someone running for a local office.

Disclosure requirements included in the law require social media companies to divulge standards for how they censor, deplatform, and shadow-ban users. Companies would be required to notify users if they are being censored in any way and allow users to see how other users view their posts so they can decide for themselves if they are being censored or shadowbanned.
Read more here: https://www.courthousenews.com/florida ... ship-law/
Don't mourn, organize.

-Joe Hill
User avatar
caltrek
Posts: 9280
Joined: Mon May 17, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: Social Media & Big Tech news and discussions

Post by caltrek »

Telegram Cuts Its Subscription Fee by More Than Half in India
by Manish Singh
October 1, 2022

Introduction:
(TechCrunch) Telegram has cut the monthly subscription fee for its premium tier by more than half in India, just months after introducing the offering as it attempts to aggressively cash in on a large user base in one of its biggest markets.

In a message to users in India on Saturday, Telegram said it was making the subscription available in the country at a discount. The monthly subscription now costs customers 179 Indian rupees ($2.2), down from 469 Indian rupees ($5.74) earlier. The app’s monthly subscription, called Telegram Premium, costs between $4.99 to $6 in every other market.

Users who have not received the message are also seeing the new price in the settings section of the app, they said and TechCrunch independently verified.

India is one of the largest markets for Telegram. The instant messaging app has amassed over 120 million monthly active users in the country, according to analytics firm data.ai. (An industry executive shared the figures with TechCrunch.) That figure makes the app the second most popular in its category in the country, only second to WhatsApp, which has courted over half a billion users in the South Asian market.

Telegram, which claims to have amassed over 700 million monthly active users globally, introduced the optional subscription offering in June this year in a move it hopes will improve its finances and continuing to support a free tier.
Read more here: https://techcrunch.com/2022/10/01/tele ... e-change/

caltrek’s comment: One thing that I learned in reading the rest of the article is that Telegram is headquartered in Dubai.
Don't mourn, organize.

-Joe Hill
Post Reply