USA News and Discussions

User avatar
caltrek
Posts: 9285
Joined: Mon May 17, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: USA News and Discussions

Post by caltrek »

The Other Cancel Culture: How a Public University Is Bowing to a Conservative Crusade
by Daniel Golden and Kirsten Berg
June 29, 2022

Introduction:
(ProPublica) In August 2020, Boise State University chose a doctoral student in public policy, Melanie Fillmore, to deliver what is called a “land acknowledgment” speech at a convocation for incoming freshmen. Fillmore, who is part Indigenous, would recognize the tribes that lived in the Boise Valley before they were banished to reservations to make way for white settlers.

The convocation was to be virtual, because of the pandemic. Fillmore put on beaded Native American jewelry and recorded an eight-minute video on her phone. She began by naming the “rightful owners of this land,” the Boise Valley Indigenous tribes, and then described her own “complicated” background. Her father was Hunkpapa Lakota, her mother white. “I can trace eight generations of my Lakota ancestors being removed from the land of their lifeblood to the reservation, just as I can trace seven generations of Norwegian and English ancestors taking that land,” she said.

She submitted her speech to the university, but the students never heard it. Boise State higher-ups thought that it was too long and too provocative to roll out in a politically precarious climate, one former official said. They consulted another administrator about whether to drop the speech. “I communicated that pulling it was a bad idea and incredibly wrong,” said this person, who has also left the university. “I don’t believe in de-platforming Indigenous voices.”

The advice was disregarded. Two days before the convocation, the vice president for student affairs told Fillmore that her appearance was canceled, explaining that her safety might be at risk or that she might be trolled or doxxed online.

Fillmore was devastated. She had encouraged the students to tell their stories, and now hers was being erased. She wondered if administrators were worried about the timing. The Idaho Legislature — which normally meets from January to March, when it decides how much money to give to public education, including Boise State — would hold a special session three days after the convocation to consider COVID-19 measures. Conservative legislators, who ever since Tromp’s arrival had been attacking Boise State’s diversity initiatives, might hear about Fillmore’s talk and seize on it to bash the university.
Read more here: https://www.propublica.org/article/id ... iversity
Don't mourn, organize.

-Joe Hill
User avatar
caltrek
Posts: 9285
Joined: Mon May 17, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: USA News and Discussions

Post by caltrek »

How Clarence Thomas Went From a 'Fringe Figure with Extremist Views' to the Court’s 'Center of Gravity'
by Alex Henderson
July 11, 2022

Introduction:
(Alternet) For many years, Justice Clarence Thomas and the late Antonin Scalia were considered the fringe of the U.S. Supreme Court — far-right social conservatives who frequently butted heads with the late liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg as well as right-wing libertarian Justice Anthony Kennedy, now retired. But with the High Court handing down one extreme decision after another in 2022, from overturning Roe v. Wade to limiting the Environment Protection Agency’s ability to regulate power plants, it’s obvious that the Court’s Thomas wing is now dominant.

Journalist David Smith, in an article published by The Guardian on July 10, emphasizes that Thomas, now 74, has become increasingly influential on the Court. According to Smith, the days when Thomas was regarded the Court’s “fringe figure with extremist views” are over — and the Court’s “center of gravity” has “moved his way.”

Edward Fallone, a law professor at Marquette University Law School in Milwaukee, told The Guardian, “By virtue of the fact that Clarence Thomas has been on the Supreme Court as long as he has, he has slowly gained much more influence and has now become the dominant ideological leader of the conservatives. He is certainly more confident and more muscular now that he has allies on his side, but he has been strikingly consistent over the decades. He simply waited for the rest of the conservative world to catch up to him.”
Read more here: https://www.alternet.org/2022/07/why- ... -report/
Don't mourn, organize.

-Joe Hill
User avatar
caltrek
Posts: 9285
Joined: Mon May 17, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: USA News and Discussions

Post by caltrek »

The Post-legal Supreme Court
by Ian Millhiser
July 9, 2022

Introduction:
(Vox) The highest Court in the most powerful nation in the world appears to have decided that it only needs to follow the law when it feels like it.

Last December, for example, the Supreme Court handed down a decision that fundamentally alters the Union — giving states sweeping authority to restrict their residents’ constitutional rights.

At least, that’s what happened if you take the Court’s 5-4 decision in Whole Woman’s Health v. Jackson seriously. Jackson involved Texas’s anti-abortion law SB 8, which allowed “any person” who is not employed by the state to sue anyone they suspect of performing an abortion after the sixth week of pregnancy, and to collect a bounty of at least $10,000 from that abortion provider. The Court allowed that law to take effect, even though abortion was still considered a constitutional right at the time.

If you apply the logic from Jackson more broadly, any state could pass a law unleashing such litigious bounty hunters upon people who exercise any constitutional right. Perhaps a state wants to make it illegal to own a gun, or maybe it wants to allow bounty hunters to sue any Black family that sends its child to a predominantly white school — and the federal judiciary will simply stand back and let it happen. Realistically, the Court is unlikely to allow these sorts of attacks. But to spite abortion, the conservative majority was willing to open the door to them.

Jackson, moreover, was only the beginning of a Rumspringa of conservative excess led by the Court’s Republican-appointed majority.
Read more here: https://www.vox.com/23180634/supreme- ... guns-epa
Don't mourn, organize.

-Joe Hill
weatheriscool
Posts: 24523
Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 6:16 pm
Contact:

Re: USA News and Discussions

Post by weatheriscool »

Campaign manager Brad Parscale blamed Jan 6 deaths on Trump, text messages reveal
Source: Independent

Brad Parscale also said he ‘felt guilty’ for helping ex-president win White House

Graeme Massie
Los Angeles
2 minutes ago

Donald Trump’s former senior campaign adviser blamed the death of a woman in the US Capitol riot on the former president’s heated rhetoric, text messages have revealed. Brad Parscale appeared to be referring to the death of Ashli Babbit, who was fatally shot by law enforcement during the deadly insurrection, in messages to fellow Trump adviser Katrina Pierson that were shared at the latest January 6 hearing.

In the messages from the day of the riot, Mr Parscale told Ms Pierson that he “felt guilty” for helping Mr Trump win the White House, and described him as “a sitting president asking for civil war.”

Ms Pierson then responded to his message, telling her fellow insider, “You did what you felt right at the time and therefore it was right.”

And Mr Parscale replied, “Yeah, but a woman is dead.” He then added, “If I was Trump and I knew my rhetoric killed someone.” Ms Pierson then responded, “It wasn’t the rhetoric.”
Read more: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/worl ... 21706.html

We now know why he was fired!
weatheriscool
Posts: 24523
Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 6:16 pm
Contact:

Re: USA News and Discussions

Post by weatheriscool »

Mexico agrees to provide $1.5 billion to help U.S. manage migrants on southern border
Source: NBC News
The Mexican government has agreed to provide roughly $1.5 billion toward a host of new construction projects along the U.S.-Mexico border to strengthen the United States’ ability to screen and process migrants, a White House official said Tuesday.

The agreement was discussed on Tuesday when Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador met with President Joe Biden at the White House.

Former President Donald Trump campaigned on the promise of building a new border wall that he would get Mexico to pay for. While the Trump administration did build hundreds of miles of new and renovated border wall, the Mexican government did not pay for it.

Now, Mexico has agreed to pay for a host of projects through a joint multi-year effort along the two country’s borders, including “modernizing” ports of entry and enhancing screening processes of immigrants attempting to cross from Mexico to the United States. The exact details of the new projects are still being worked out, but, the official said, the new agreement will not result in the building of any kind of wall or border barrier.
Read more: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/me ... ar-AAZvuwk
User avatar
wjfox
Site Admin
Posts: 13589
Joined: Sat May 15, 2021 6:09 pm
Location: Essex, UK
Contact:

Re: USA News and Discussions

Post by wjfox »

User avatar
caltrek
Posts: 9285
Joined: Mon May 17, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: USA News and Discussions

Post by caltrek »

^^^This is what liberals mean when they talk about the need to be politically correct. Of course, now all sorts of folks are going to be screaming about how the liberal left supports censorship, cancel culture, etc. Perhaps if such "conservatives" taught their own to be more polite, such support would not arise. But hey, why be logical when you can just blame the victim.
Don't mourn, organize.

-Joe Hill
Xyls
Posts: 689
Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 9:20 pm

Re: USA News and Discussions

Post by Xyls »

Biden making some very dumb remarks:

Biden Calls Inflation Numbers ‘Out of Date.’ Americans Disagree

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... ium-canada

This is the kind of remark that could get the Democrats pulverized in the mid-terms.
User avatar
caltrek
Posts: 9285
Joined: Mon May 17, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: USA News and Discussions

Post by caltrek »

Xyls wrote: Thu Jul 14, 2022 9:26 pm Biden making some very dumb remarks:

Biden Calls Inflation Numbers ‘Out of Date.’ Americans Disagree

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... ium-canada

This is the kind of remark that could get the Democrats pulverized in the mid-terms.
Interesting map included with the article. It shows "Where Prices are Rising the Fastest" in the United States. States with the lowest rise in inflation:

New York, Delaware, and Pennsylvania. All blue (or purple) states.

States with the highest rise in inflation?

Texas, Oklahoma, Louisiana, and Missouri. (All red states).

So, I am not sure it is the Democrats who have the most to fear from the bad inflation news. Especially when you take into account that California is actually in the process of issuing tax rebate checks in recognition of the painful effects of inflation in their states. Hopefully, other blue states flushed with high tax revenues due to a full employment economy, will do the same.

But yes, Biden was a little tone deaf in his remarks. In any case, we need somebody who can better frame the issues debate in 2024.
Don't mourn, organize.

-Joe Hill
User avatar
caltrek
Posts: 9285
Joined: Mon May 17, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: USA News and Discussions

Post by caltrek »

Biden Extends Streak of New Court Picks as Midterms Draw Near
by Rose Wagner
July 14, 2022

Introduction:
WASHINGTON (Courthouse News) — President Joe Biden announced four new nominees to the federal bench Thursday, as well as three prospective judges to serve on local courts in the nation’s capital.

The slew of nominees marked three days of back-to-back judicial nominations from the White House, with Biden aiming to fill court vacancies at a rapid pace as the midterms get closer. All judicial nominees require Senate confirmation before they ascend to the federal bench, a process that could get trickier if Democrats lose their majority in the tightly-divided chamber in November.


Biden also nominated Matthew Garcia to serve as a federal district judge for the District of New Mexico. Garcia is chief of staff to New Mexico Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham, a Democrat. He previously served as Grisham’s general counsel.

Judge Andrew G. Schopler is Biden’s nominee to serve as a district judge for the Southern District of California. A magistrate judge in the district since 2016, he is also a member of the United States Army Reserve and California National Guard.

Another California-based nominee, Judge James Edward Simmons Jr., is slated to fill a vacancy on the District Court for the Southern District of California.
Read more here: https://www.courthousenews.com/biden- ... aw-near/
Don't mourn, organize.

-Joe Hill
Vakanai
Posts: 534
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2022 10:23 pm

Re: USA News and Discussions

Post by Vakanai »

caltrek wrote: Thu Jul 14, 2022 9:48 pm
Xyls wrote: Thu Jul 14, 2022 9:26 pm Biden making some very dumb remarks:

Biden Calls Inflation Numbers ‘Out of Date.’ Americans Disagree

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... ium-canada

This is the kind of remark that could get the Democrats pulverized in the mid-terms.
Interesting map included with the article. It shows "Where Prices are Rising the Fastest" in the United States. States with the lowest rise in inflation:

New York, Delaware, and Pennsylvania. All blue (or purple) states.

States with the highest rise in inflation?

Texas, Oklahoma, Louisiana, and Missouri. (All red states).

So, I am not sure it is the Democrats who have the most to fear from the bad inflation news. Especially when you take into account that California is actually in the process of issuing tax rebate checks in recognition of the painful effects of inflation in their states. Hopefully, other blue states flushed with high tax revenues due to a full employment economy, will do the same.

But yes, Biden was a little tone deaf in his remarks. In any case, we need somebody who can better frame the issues debate in 2024.
Unfortunately most Americans unrealistically put the economy on the president, not on their state representatives.
User avatar
caltrek
Posts: 9285
Joined: Mon May 17, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: USA News and Discussions

Post by caltrek »

Vakanai wrote: Fri Jul 15, 2022 12:30 am
caltrek wrote: Thu Jul 14, 2022 9:48 pm
Xyls wrote: Thu Jul 14, 2022 9:26 pm Biden making some very dumb remarks:

Biden Calls Inflation Numbers ‘Out of Date.’ Americans Disagree

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... ium-canada

This is the kind of remark that could get the Democrats pulverized in the mid-terms.
Interesting map included with the article. It shows "Where Prices are Rising the Fastest" in the United States. States with the lowest rise in inflation:

New York, Delaware, and Pennsylvania. All blue (or purple) states.

States with the highest rise in inflation?

Texas, Oklahoma, Louisiana, and Missouri. (All red states).

So, I am not sure it is the Democrats who have the most to fear from the bad inflation news. Especially when you take into account that California is actually in the process of issuing tax rebate checks in recognition of the painful effects of inflation in their states. Hopefully, other blue states flushed with high tax revenues due to a full employment economy, will do the same.

But yes, Biden was a little tone deaf in his remarks. In any case, we need somebody who can better frame the issues debate in 2024.
Unfortunately most Americans unrealistically put the economy on the president, not on their state representatives.
When they are voting for president. If things are going rough, that can be hard on all incumbents. Of course, incumbents have more resources to, as I said, frame the issues. So, yes, there will be a lot of attempts to shift the blame.

Biden will have the headlines going for him. Most people are aware that there is a war going on in the Ukraine, that there is too much inequality of wealth and power in this country, and even that extreme weather events may be adversely affecting food prices. Of course, Biden will need to be careful not to overplay his hand or appear to be tone deaf.
Don't mourn, organize.

-Joe Hill
User avatar
caltrek
Posts: 9285
Joined: Mon May 17, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: USA News and Discussions

Post by caltrek »

Another issue that conservatives will try to use is that of immigration.

From Texas to Arizona, the GOP Border “Invasion” Argument Keeps Getting Crazier
by Isabela Davis
July 15, 2022

Introduction:
(Mother Jones) During a press conference on July 5, several county officials from Texas gathered to pray, read the Pledge of Allegiance, and issue a declaration stating they were under a migrant “invasion.” Among the local leaders and county judges present was the mayor of Uvalde, Don McLaughlin, who referred to the tragic mass shooting at Robb Elementary School that killed 19 children and two teachers when denouncing an “influx of pedophiles, convicted murderers, drug dealers, and gang members” and warning about “bailouts” ahead of kids returning to school.

Besides disseminating racist tropes and scapegoating migrants, they were there to pressure Governor Greg Abbott to “acknowledge the existence of an invasion on our border with Mexico and take necessary actions to preserve and protect the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Texas.” Make no mistake: The goal here is to declare a war on migrants and justify the use of combat-like force to remove them. This is not an exaggeration. None other than Republican Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick of Texas was explicit on Fox News: “We are being invaded and if we’re being invaded under the Constitution, I think that gives us the power to put hands on people and send them back,” he said. “We’re under attack like at Pearl Harbor.”

One of the masterminds behind the “invasion” legal argument is Ken Cuccinelli, former Virginia attorney general, and Trump’s Department of Homeland Security official. Now a senior fellow with the right-wing think tank Center for Renewing America, he’s a proponent, along with Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich, of states invoking a “self-help” measure under Article I, Section 10, Clause 3 of the US Constitution. This passage states: “No state shall, without the consent of Congress, lay any duty of tonnage, keep troops, or ships of war in time of peace, enter into any agreement or compact with another state, or with a foreign power, or engage in war, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent danger as will not admit delay.”

In other words, they argue that the federal government has failed to fulfill its constitutional duty to protect states from an invasion, and, therefore, it’s up to states to defend themselves.
Read more here: https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2 ... razier/
Don't mourn, organize.

-Joe Hill
User avatar
caltrek
Posts: 9285
Joined: Mon May 17, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: USA News and Discussions

Post by caltrek »

...and then there is abortion.

The House Just Passed Two Bills to Protect Access to Abortion
by Jackie Flynn Mogensen
July 15, 2022

Introduction:
(Mother Jones) Exactly three weeks after the Supreme Court voted to overturn Roe v. Wade, the House of Representatives passed two bills aimed at protecting the right to abortion in the United States. Neither of the bills advanced on Friday is likely to succeed in the Senate.

One of the bills, the Women’s Health Protection Act, passed 219 to 210 with one Texas Democrat, Rep. Henry Cuellar, voting with all House Republicans against the measure. The bill, which would legally grant medical professionals the ability to provide abortions to patients, passed in the House in September, but has been blocked in the Senate.

The other measure, the Ensuring Access to Abortion Act, passed 223 to 205, would allow residents to cross state lines to seek an abortion. Three Republican House members—Reps. Adam Kinzinger of Illinois, Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, and Fred Upton of Michigan—voted with Democrats in favor of the bill.

Although both bills appear doomed in the split Senate, they come at a time that marks just the beginning of a long battle ahead for many pro-choice health care workers, lawyers, and activists in the US. For a full breakdown of the future of abortion, don’t miss our recent reporting package in partnership with Rewire News Group: “Where Do We Go From Here?“
Read more here: https://www.motherjones.com/politics ... n-rights/
Don't mourn, organize.

-Joe Hill
User avatar
Time_Traveller
Posts: 3025
Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 4:49 pm
Location: New York City, USA, November 5th 2032 C.E.

Re: USA News and Discussions

Post by Time_Traveller »

caltrek wrote: Sat Jul 16, 2022 5:01 pm ...and then there is abortion.

The House Just Passed Two Bills to Protect Access to Abortion
by Jackie Flynn Mogensen
July 15, 2022

Introduction:
(Mother Jones) Exactly three weeks after the Supreme Court voted to overturn Roe v. Wade, the House of Representatives passed two bills aimed at protecting the right to abortion in the United States. Neither of the bills advanced on Friday is likely to succeed in the Senate.

One of the bills, the Women’s Health Protection Act, passed 219 to 210 with one Texas Democrat, Rep. Henry Cuellar, voting with all House Republicans against the measure. The bill, which would legally grant medical professionals the ability to provide abortions to patients, passed in the House in September, but has been blocked in the Senate.

The other measure, the Ensuring Access to Abortion Act, passed 223 to 205, would allow residents to cross state lines to seek an abortion. Three Republican House members—Reps. Adam Kinzinger of Illinois, Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, and Fred Upton of Michigan—voted with Democrats in favor of the bill.

Although both bills appear doomed in the split Senate, they come at a time that marks just the beginning of a long battle ahead for many pro-choice health care workers, lawyers, and activists in the US. For a full breakdown of the future of abortion, don’t miss our recent reporting package in partnership with Rewire News Group: “Where Do We Go From Here?“
Read more here: https://www.motherjones.com/politics ... n-rights/
Fight and continue to fight for your rights wherever you are.
“In the quantum multiverse, every choice, every decision you've ever and never made exists in an unimaginably vast ensemble of parallel universes.”
User avatar
caltrek
Posts: 9285
Joined: Mon May 17, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: USA News and Discussions

Post by caltrek »

^^^Along those lines:

After Roe’s Reversal, Founders of Women’s Health Startups Prepare for Battle
by Dominic-Madori Davis
July 16, 2022

Introduction:
(TechCrunch) Advocates and organizers had been preparing for Roe v. Wade to be overturned since the U.S. Supreme Court draft decision leaked in early May. But Nadya Okamoto, co-founder of period care company August, still felt heartbroken when the decision became official in late June.

“One of the things that always made me passionate about policy and legislative action was that it always felt so permanent,” she told TechCrunch. “For Roe to be rolled back went against many of the beliefs I had about change and social progress.”

Activists like Okamoto are now on the front lines of once again protesting for an individual’s right to an abortion. As a startup founder, Okamoto said she’s ready to use her platform and position to help educate and influence others — and she’s not alone.

Many women founders running reproductive health companies are taking battle stances as the U.S. slips into a reality worse than what existed pre-Roe. Come November, 26 states face a near-total abortion ban.

The decision to reverse Roe also paves the way for the erosion of other rights, such as those that gave the right to interracial and gay marriage.
Read more here: https://techcrunch.com/2022/07/16/aft ... -battle/

Here is another article on the same theme: https://techcrunch.com/2022/07/07/roe- ... ed-states/

caltrek's comment: We need to remember that an attack against one is an attack against all.
Don't mourn, organize.

-Joe Hill
User avatar
caltrek
Posts: 9285
Joined: Mon May 17, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: USA News and Discussions

Post by caltrek »

Statement Concerning the Supreme Court Overturning Roe v. Wade


Introduction:
(Women’s Foundation of Mississippi) The mission of the Women’s Foundation of Mississippi is economic security for women. We operate from a place of opportunity for women.

These principles guide our work:

• We are advocates, catalysts for transformation in the lives of women and girls, monitoring public discourse, educating, sharing information, and supporting policies to achieve meaningful change. We strive for social justice, promoting equal access to opportunity and to equity in all aspects of life. We believe in inclusiveness, embracing diversity reflective of Mississippi’s population, welcoming and valuing different perspectives and opinions. We believe in accountability, through transparency and informed, responsive use of our resources in achieving our mission. We believe in sustainability for The Women’s Foundation, through fiscal responsibility and organizational strength, stewarding resources to meet the unique needs of women and girls.

• We trust that a woman will make informed, educated decisions about her health and her family’s health. We support an individual’s right to privacy and confidentiality between herself and her health care providers. We support an individual’s right to receive medically accurate information from medical professionals and in public schools; we align ourselves with mainstream medical groups such as the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), the American Medical Association (AMA), the American Academy of Pediatrics (APA), the American Nurses Association (ANA), the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

• We oppose intrusive, excessive, and unnecessary government interference in a woman’s life and personal decisions.

• We believe all Mississippians have the right to obtain quality, affordable public education, particularly post-secondary education, that can lead to good jobs and economic self-sufficiency. We recognize there are significant obstacles to achieving this goal. We value addressing the systemic, root causes of income inequality.
Read more here: https://www.womensfoundationms.org/jun ... atement/
Don't mourn, organize.

-Joe Hill
weatheriscool
Posts: 24523
Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 6:16 pm
Contact:

Re: USA News and Discussions

Post by weatheriscool »

U.S. wants to end dependence on China rare earths, Yellen says
Source: Reuters
SEOUL, July 18 (Reuters) - The United States wants to end its "undue dependence" on rare earths, solar panels and other key goods from China to prevent Beijing from cutting off supplies as it has done to other countries, U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said. Yellen, who arrived in Seoul late on Monday, told Reuters she was pushing for increased trade ties with South Korea and other trusted allies to improve the resilience of supply chains and avert possible manipulation by geopolitical rivals.

"Resilient supply chains mean a diversity of sources of supply and eliminating to the extent we can the possibility that geopolitical rivals will be able to manipulate us and threaten our security," she said in an interview en route to Seoul. Yellen will map out her concerns in a major policy address in Seoul on Tuesday after touring the facilities of South Korean tech heavyweight LG Corp (003550.KS) during the final leg of an 11-day visit to the Indo-Pacific region.

According to excerpts of her remarks, Yellen will make a strong pitch for "friend-shoring" or diversifying U.S. supply chains to rely more on trusted trading partners, a move she said would also combat inflation and help counter China's "unfair trade practices." Yellen said South Korea had “tremendous strengths in terms of resources, technology, abilities” and its companies, including LG, were already investing in the United States.

"They have substantial capacity to produce advanced semiconductors," was particularly important given the United States' "huge dependence" on Taiwan Semiconductor, she said. It was critical to reduce U.S. dependence on certain Chinese exports since Beijing had cut off supplies to countries such as Japan in the past, while applying pressure in other ways to Australia and Lithuania, a senior Treasury official said.
Read more: https://www.reuters.com/markets/us/us-w ... 022-07-18/
User avatar
caltrek
Posts: 9285
Joined: Mon May 17, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: USA News and Discussions

Post by caltrek »

Structuring the Economy to Give Money to the Rich Is Inflationary
by Dean Baker
July 18, 2022

Extract:
(Common Dreams) (P)olicies that give more money to people at the top are inflationary. The fact that we structured our patent rules and pandemic handouts to create five Moderna billionaires, and many other very wealthy people at Moderna and other pharmaceutical companies, meant that we had people at the top spending more on housing, cars, vacations, and other items that increased demand in the economy. Just as it can be inflationary when the government sends people $2,000 checks, and they spend it, it can be inflationary when the government transfers…hundreds of billions of dollars annually to the people in a position to benefit from the patent monopolies it has granted.

Similarly, the fact that our doctors earn more than twice as much as their counterparts in other wealthy countries, because we protect them from the sort of competition to which we subject our manufacturing workers, means that we have almost 1 million doctors with the equivalent of $150,000 checks from the government each year… The same is true of dentists, lawyers, and other high-end professionals who our politicians look to protect from competition rather than seek economic efficiency.

We also transfer tens of billions of dollars upward to CEOs and other top corporate executives through the corrupt corporate governance structure that we have instituted. A recent study surveyed corporate directors and found that the vast majority did not even see it as their job to contain CEO pay. Instead, they saw their role as supporting top management.

In this context, it is not surprising that even mediocre CEOs can get paychecks in the tens of millions of dollars annually...If the CEO gets $20 million, the chief financial officer might get $10 to $12 million, and even third-tier executives may get $2 to $3 million. This is all inflationary. Again, it has the same impact on the economy as if the government were sending checks of this size to top executives.

There are other ways in which the economy has been structured to give more money to those at the top, at the expense of the working class. (See Rigged: How Globalization and the Rules of the Modern Economy Were Structured to Make the Rich Richer https://deanbaker.net/books/rigged.htm [it’s free].)
Read more here: https://www.commondreams.org/views/202 ... tionary

caltrek’s comment: Good luck getting conservative Republicans to agree with these arguments and act upon the given recommendations
Don't mourn, organize.

-Joe Hill
User avatar
caltrek
Posts: 9285
Joined: Mon May 17, 2021 1:17 pm

Re: USA News and Discussions

Post by caltrek »

99% of House GOP Just Showed They Support Forcing Children to Birth 'Their Rapist's Child'
by Jessica Corbett
July 15, 2022

Introduction:
(Common Dreams) While reproductive rights advocates and many Democrats on Friday welcomed the U.S. House of Representatives' passage of a bill protecting the right to travel for abortion care, Congressman Bill Pascrell Jr. called out GOP lawmakers who opposed the legislation.

"Today 99% of House Republicans made clear they support forcing raped children to give birth to their rapist's child," declared the New Jersey Democrat after the House approved the Ensuring Access to Abortion Act in a 223-205 vote.

Just three Republicans—Reps. Brian Fitzpatrick (Pa.), Adam Kinzinger (Ill.), and Fred Upton (Mich.)—joined Democrats in supporting the bill, and another three—Reps. Liz Cheney (Wyo.), Anthony Gonzalez (Ohio), and Nancy Mace (S.C.)—did not vote on it.

The development comes as the story of a 10-year-old rape victim forced to travel from Ohio to Indiana for an abortion has garnered national attention, and as anti-choice groups and state lawmakers are crafting legislation to try to prevent people from traveling for such care.
Read more here: https://www.commondreams.org/news/202 ... ts-child

[
Don't mourn, organize.

-Joe Hill
Post Reply