Re: Superconductors news and discussions
Posted: Sat Aug 05, 2023 2:23 pm
I would wait for more footage.spryfusion wrote: ↑Sat Aug 05, 2023 8:26 am
Video source: https://www.douyin.com/video/7263715495256378659
A community of futurology enthusiasts
https://futuretimeline.net/forum/
I would wait for more footage.spryfusion wrote: ↑Sat Aug 05, 2023 8:26 am
Video source: https://www.douyin.com/video/7263715495256378659
A week later, results have come up short.firestar464 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 31, 2023 10:33 pm https://www.science.org/content/article ... e-doubtful
Experts are pressing "x to doubt" on the Korean team's claims
We'll see within a week.
I hope it doesn't take a year .Cyber_Rebel wrote: ↑Mon Aug 07, 2023 11:30 pm It's not Joever just yet, but yes, a peer reviewed paper and published by a highly reputable source would be much appreciated.
Researchers at Korea University of Energy and Technology confirmed that the crystal structure of a sample of ‘LK-99’, proposed room temperature superconductor, is the same as the crystal structure presented in the original papers by Sukbae Lee, Jihoon Kim et al. The College of Energy Engineering is the only external institution conducting research after receiving samples of LK-99 from the Quantum Energy Research Institute.
A researcher at Korea Energy Engineering University, who is participating in the LK-99 study, said in a phone call with the Digital Times on the 8th, “As a result of analyzing the X-ray diffraction structure of the sample, it was confirmed that the fine crystal structure of the sample is the same as that presented in the paper.” said.
The researcher said, “If you look at the microcrystalline structure, you can estimate the possibility even if you cannot confirm the physical properties of the material. As a result of confirming the microcrystalline structure with X-rays for the analysis of LK-99, the Quantum Energy Research Institute has a different crystal structure and The crystal structure confirmed in the sample was the same,” he said.