He is tripled-jabbed, but even so...
I'll be visiting him over Christmas, and I don't get my 3rd jab until Dec 23rd.
(TAYLOR & FRANCIS GROUP via EurekAlert) Published today, one of the earliest, peer-reviewed studies looking into the Omicron variant of COVID-19 suggests that people previously infected with COVID, and those vaccinated, will have some, “stronger than basic” defence against this new strain of concern.
However, the test tube (or ‘in-vitro’, scientifically) samples of Omicron examined in this new research do show it “exceeds” all other variants in its potential capability to evade the protection gained from previous infection or vaccination.
Published in Emerging Microbes & Infection, the findings also suggest that although a third-dose enhancement strategy can “significantly boost immunity”, the protection from Omicron “may be compromised” – but more research is needed to better understand this.
Reporting on this very early study, lead author Youchun Wang, Senior Research Fellow from the National Institutes for Food and Drug Control in China, says their results support recent findings in South Africa which highlight Omicron was “easy to evade immunity”.
“We found the large number of mutations of the Omicron variant did cause significant changes of neutralization sensitivity against people who had already had COVID,” Wang says.
the speed of omicrons spread, mixed with the fact that the children 5 and under really have not been able to be vaccinated, coupled with the worrying data that says more than 60% of those under 5 who get it are severe cases... the lack of vaccinations of any children under certain ages, partly due to the vaccines not being approved for children of young age, and partly anxiety on the publics part about vaccines in children, has been a major problem that too many people have been trying to work around by imagining that we would simply solve this by controlling the virus in the adult population so the kids are less risk. Or that the illness wouldn't be a sever in children.caltrek wrote: ↑Sun Dec 12, 2021 7:22 pm ^^^I haven't read through the "replies" but I am not sure what is meant by " With the infectivity and household transmission rates
reported last night, total lack of vaccination, we’re in forChristmas." I am especially confused by the phrase "total lack of vaccination." Do they mean transmission rates for those who are not vaccinated... or, perhaps that the current level of vaccination is inadequate because it is so low?
Read more: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/us-co ... ar-AARJS38More than 450,000 people in the United States have died after contracting COVID-19 so far in 2021, according to the news service, which added that the total accounts for 57 percent of all U.S. deaths from the illness since the pandemic started.
The 2021 death toll in the U.S. had already surpassed the 2020 total in November. Data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention indicates that the total number of deaths involving COVID-19 in 2020 was 385,343.
The grim U.S. milestone comes despite the fact that the country has authorized three COVID-19 vaccines and has given booster doses the green light for all adults and for 16- and 17-year-olds.
Yes, I think this strikes a nice balance between the "strap them down on a table and inject it into their arms, never mind their screams of protest" and "it's a free country, let them do what they want - but don't fine them for the additional burdens they impose."And I support these staff 100% refusing to do anymore COVID medical interventions for antivaxxers. Anyone who gets COVID and has not been vaccinated at this point (save for those who can't/young children) should be left to die. It is not medical staff's responsibility to be burdened by these people or misdirected from other areas where people need treatment. Many of these antivaxxers are too far gone to change their opinions, and who knows what their behavior would be in the next pandemic. We should not be trying to save people who are actively going out of their way to harm everyone else... Not to mention these costs get dumped on taxpayers in public health care system countries.
Hope to see more of this going forward until the government gets the memo.
I don't think this discussion is relevant as it is very polarizing and most of the hospital beds are now attending vaccinated persons and the trend is continuing to rise (due to high % vaccine rollout).caltrek wrote: ↑Mon Dec 13, 2021 12:06 amYes, I think this strikes a nice balance between the "strap them down on a table and inject it into their arms, never mind their screams of protest" and "it's a free country, let them do what they want - but don't fine them for the additional burdens they impose."And I support these staff 100% refusing to do anymore COVID medical interventions for antivaxxers. Anyone who gets COVID and has not been vaccinated at this point (save for those who can't/young children) should be left to die. It is not medical staff's responsibility to be burdened by these people or misdirected from other areas where people need treatment. Many of these antivaxxers are too far gone to change their opinions, and who knows what their behavior would be in the next pandemic. We should not be trying to save people who are actively going out of their way to harm everyone else... Not to mention these costs get dumped on taxpayers in public health care system countries.
Hope to see more of this going forward until the government gets the memo.
...and yes, some are so far gone that the louder you insist that they vaccinate the more they are going to suspect a conspiracy. So, make sure they have the latest scientific opinions, whether they agree with them or not, and give them a couple of alternatives. Like, maybe, 1) vaccinate, or 2) pay an additional insurance premium. Other alternatives might include: being employed here, at this firm, is dependent upon you being vaccinated - unless you are a one hundred percent remote worker.
Read more: https://www.axios.com/winter-omicron-wa ... 4c52c.htmlData flooding in from South Africa and Europe is clear: The Omicron variant is spreading extremely quickly, including among vaccinated people.
Why it matters: If this trend holds up, that means a lot of people — around the world and in the U.S. — are about to get sick, even if only mildly so.
Driving the news: An early estimate published yesterday by the UK found that two doses of the Pfizer vaccine are only about 30% effective against symptomatic infection with Omicron, and the AstraZeneca vaccine isn't effective at all.
A booster shot of the Pfizer vaccine, however, increases effectiveness to 70-75%.