Weird how bs like religion is never questioned or pulsed but science and human advancement always is.
Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) News and Discussions
Re: Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) News and Discussions
A vote for Trump, a third party candidate, or no vote at all, is a vote for a dystopian future.
-
- Posts: 418
- Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2021 4:29 am
-
- Posts: 418
- Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2021 4:29 am
Re: Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) News and Discussions
A vote for Trump, a third party candidate, or no vote at all, is a vote for a dystopian future.
-
- Posts: 13874
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 6:16 pm
-
- Posts: 418
- Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2021 4:29 am
-
- Posts: 937
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2022 7:45 am
Re: Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) News and Discussions
1 year imo. FEEL THE AGI
-
- Posts: 937
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2022 7:45 am
Re: Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) News and Discussions
Well by then we'd have already achieved AGI for a few years, so at least that's some consolation.weatheriscool wrote: ↑Sat Mar 23, 2024 6:55 amWeird how bs like religion is never questioned or pulsed but science and human advancement always is.
Re: Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) News and Discussions
Showerthought, and a summarization of David Shapiro's comment:
"AGI may already be here. We just haven't woken it up yet."
Based on Andrew Ng's post on agentic AI, and my own musings
To me it seems plausible that a first-generation AGI ought to be a fusion of an LLM + agent swarm + concept search, and if that's the case, there's no reason why someone had not experimented to see if this is the case yet
In fact the way I think of it now is ironically like a corporation: foundational models are literally like the foundation, the building itself, which may have some functionality (e.g. utilities, internet connection, robotic security, etc.) But a corporation is not just a building (save for money laundering purposes). It's the humans inside that make it work, and they are a cascading hierarchy— agent swarms likely will operate similarly, with executive-level cognitive agents and adversarial agents that challenge decisions, and various smaller subagents with new ones "hired" by the larger ones as necessary.
"AGI may already be here. We just haven't woken it up yet."
Based on Andrew Ng's post on agentic AI, and my own musings
GPT-3.5 (zero shot) was 48.1% correct. GPT-4 (zero shot) does better at 67.0%. However, the improvement from GPT-3.5 to GPT-4 is dwarfed by incorporating an iterative agent workflow. Indeed, wrapped in an agent loop, GPT-3.5 achieves up to 95.1%.
To me it seems plausible that a first-generation AGI ought to be a fusion of an LLM + agent swarm + concept search, and if that's the case, there's no reason why someone had not experimented to see if this is the case yet
In fact the way I think of it now is ironically like a corporation: foundational models are literally like the foundation, the building itself, which may have some functionality (e.g. utilities, internet connection, robotic security, etc.) But a corporation is not just a building (save for money laundering purposes). It's the humans inside that make it work, and they are a cascading hierarchy— agent swarms likely will operate similarly, with executive-level cognitive agents and adversarial agents that challenge decisions, and various smaller subagents with new ones "hired" by the larger ones as necessary.
And remember my friend, future events such as these will affect you in the future
-
- Posts: 13874
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2021 6:16 pm